The 10 Scariest Things About Asbestos Lawsuit History

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have been bankrupt due to asbestos lawsuits filed by victims. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you secure compensation.

Health professionals and doctors for years warned of asbestos exposure's dangers. Industry leaders have downplayed the risks. As time went on, asbestos attorneys-related diseases were becoming more prevalent.

The Third Case

Asbestos-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in the 1970s after studies in science began to connect asbestos lawyer with serious diseases like asbestosis or mesothelioma. Tens of thousands of suits were filed due to the fact that asbestos lawsuit-related diseases do not usually manifest for years after exposure. A majority of these lawsuits were filed in Texas where favorable laws made it an ideal location for this litigation saga.

Johns Manville was the leading producer during the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos-related products. This case had a major impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it came to the light that the company's CEO Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that Brown was heavily influenced the company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was a doctor who was well-known for his sloppy disregard for the health of employees.

Johns Manville was found to be aware of the dangers associated with asbestos however, they failed to take any steps to protect their employees. The court determined that the company was responsible for the injuries suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also decided that the company was responsible for the family members of deceased workers.

After the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from companies that used asbestos as a material. Most of the claims were denied for a variety reasons. Some cases were allowed to be heard and the courts came up with guidelines for handling asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s, asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings that would reduce their liability. They wanted to to argue that asbestos attorneys materials were not part of their product and therefore, they shouldn't be held liable for the injuries suffered by people who worked with it. The claims were rejected and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the "asbestos products" defense.

Federal and state laws protect the rights of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a particular case. However insurance companies continue combat these claims tooth and nail.