20 Trailblazers Leading The Way In Evolution Korea
Evolution Korea
The financial crisis that hit Asia led to a major rethinking of the traditional system of government, business alliances, as well as public management of risk. In Korea, this meant a shift in the model of development.
In a controversial move, South Korea's government has requested textbook publishers to ignore requests to remove examples of evolution from high school science books. This includes evidence for evolution of horses and the Avian an ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A group of creationists in South Korea has successfully convinced textbook publishers to remove evidence of evolution from high school science texts. The move was a result of a campaign led by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR) which is an offshoot of the Korea Association for Creation Research, which wants to rid textbooks on biology of "atheist materialism." The STR claims that such materialism creates an image of negativity for students, leading them to abandon their faith.
Scientists across the globe expressed worry when the STR campaign made headlines. Jae Choe, evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul wrote in a letter to Nature's editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was backed by colleagues from around the country who formed a group named Evolution Korea to organize an anti-textbook petition.
Researchers are concerned that the STR campaign will spread to other parts of the world, where creationism is on the rise. The letter to Nature warned of the anti-evolutionist campaign putting pressure on textbook revisions, particularly in countries with large Christian and Muslim populations.
South Korea has a particularly strong cultural background for the evolution debate. 26 percent of the nation's citizens belong to one of the religious groups, and most adhere to Christianity or Buddhism. Many Koreans also adhere to Ch'ondogyo, a philosophy based upon Confucian principles, which emphasizes harmony in the social, personal self-cultivation, and self-respect. Ch'ondogyo teaches that human beings are in a relationship with Hanulnim, the God of the Sun, and that the heavenly blessings are possible through the good deeds of a person.
All of this has provided fertile ground for the spread of creationism. A number of studies have demonstrated that students who have religion-based backgrounds tend to feel more uncomfortable about learning about evolution than students who do not have a religious background. The causes behind this are not obvious. One reason is that students who have religious beliefs tend to be as knowledgeable about scientific concepts and theories which makes them more vulnerable to the influence of creationists. Another reason could be that those with religious backgrounds might view evolution as a belief system that is atheistic, making them feel less comfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent years, anti-evolution campaigns in schools have caused concern among the scientific community. A survey conducted in 2009 revealed that nearly 40 percent of Americans believed that biological evolution was not true and that it could conflict with their religious beliefs. Despite the success of creationism in some states, a lot of scientists feel that the best strategy to stop this trend is not to engage it, but rather to inform the public about the evidence that supports evolution.
Scientists are responsible for teaching their students science, 에볼루션 바카라 무료 에볼루션 - just click the next article - which includes the theory of evolution. They also need to inform the public about the process of scientific research and how knowledge is confirmed. They should explain how theories of science are often challenged and revised. However, misconceptions regarding the nature of scientific research often cause people to believe that evolution is not real.
For example, some people may confuse the word "theory" with the common meaning of the word, which is a hunch or a guess. In science, however the theory is rigorously tested and verified with evidence. A theory that is tested and observed repeatedly becomes a scientific principle.
The debate about evolution theory is an excellent occasion to discuss both the importance of scientific method and its limits. It is crucial for people to recognize that science cannot answer questions about the purpose or meaning of life, but only provides a mechanism by which living things can grow and change.
A well-rounded education must include exposure to all major scientific fields including evolutionary biology. This is crucial because a lot of jobs and decisions require that people know how science operates.
The vast majority scientists in the world agree that humans have changed over time. A recent study that predicted the adults' views of the consensus on this subject found that those who had higher levels of education and scientific knowledge were more likely to believe that there is a general consensus among scientists about human evolution. People with more religious beliefs and less knowledge of science tend to be more skeptical. It is essential that educators insist on the importance of knowing the consensus on this issue to ensure that people are able to making informed decisions regarding their health care, energy usage and other policy issues.
3. Evolution and Culture
A close cousin to the mainstream evolutionary theory, cultural evolution explores the many ways that organisms, 에볼루션게이밍 including humans, learn from and interact with each other. Researchers in this field utilize explanation models and tools that are adapted from the ones used by evolutionary theorists, and they reach back into human prehistory to find out the origins of our capacity for culture.
This method also acknowledges the differences between biological and cultural characteristics. While biological traits are generally acquired in one go (in sexual species, during fertilization), cultural traits can be acquired over a lengthy period of time. The acquisition of one cultural characteristic can affect the growth and development of another.
In Korea for instance, the adoption of Western fashion elements in the latter half of the 19th century and early 20th centuries was the result of a complicated sequence of events. One of the most important was the appearance in Korea of Japanese occupation forces, who introduced Western hairstyles and clothes.
When Japan quit Korea in the 1930s, some of these changes began to reverse. At the close of World War II, Korea was once more united, this time under the Choson dynasty rule.
Today, Korea is a vibrant economic and political power. Despite the recent global financial crisis, the country's economy has grown consistently over the last decade and is expected to sustain its steady growth in the coming years.
The current government is faced by a myriad of problems. One of the most significant is its inability to develop an effective strategy to deal with the economic crisis. The crisis has revealed weaknesses in the country's policies particularly its dependence on exports and foreign investment which could not last.
As the crisis has shattered the confidence of investors, the government has to reconsider its economic strategy and come up with alternative ways to boost domestic demand. To ensure a stable economic climate the government needs to reform its incentive system, monitoring and discipline. This chapter offers a number of scenarios of how the Korean economy could grow after the crisis.
4. Evolution and Education
The challenge for educators of evolution is how to teach evolutionary concepts that are appropriate for various levels of development and ages. Teachers should, for instance, be sensitive to the diversity of religions within their classrooms and create a welcoming environment where students of both religious and secular perspectives are at ease. Teachers should be able to recognize common misconceptions regarding evolution and know how to correct them in the classroom. Teachers should also have quick access to the many resources to teach evolution.
In this context, Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation played a significant role in bringing evolutionary researchers and educators from different sectors to discuss best practices for teaching about Evolution. The participants included representatives from scientific societies as well as educational researchers, officials from government funding agencies as well as curriculum developers. The convergence of various stakeholders led to the development of a set of shared recommendations that will serve as the basis for future actions.
A key recommendation is that the teaching of evolution should be included in all science curricula at any level. National Science Education Standards (NRC), which call for the integration of evolution across all life sciences with the developmentally appropriate, are one way to achieve this goal. A new publication from the NRC offers guidance to schools about how to integrate evolution in the life science curriculum.
Several studies have found that a more comprehensive teaching of evolution is linked to higher levels of student understanding and belief in the existence of evolution. It is difficult to estimate causal effects in the classroom because school curricula do not change in a random manner and are dependent on the timing of state board of education and gubernatorial election. To overcome this limitation I use a longitudinal dataset that allows me to control for the fixed effects of state and years as well as individual-level variations in the beliefs of teachers about evolutionary theory.
Teachers who are more comfortable in teaching evolution have fewer internal barriers. This is in line with the notion that more experienced faculty are less likely to be hesitant about questions about evolution in the classroom, and could be more likely to employ strategies such as a reconciliatory approach that is known to boost undergraduate students' acceptance of evolution.
